Showing posts with label UNHCR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNHCR. Show all posts

Thursday, July 29, 2010

The Barriers of Refugee Service in the U.S. and Jordan

We took a trip to Jordan with a group of students with a variety of backgrounds in the nonprofit sector. Several students had present work in refugee service organizations, including Heartland Alliance , World Relief, and Catholic Charities. The definition of a refugee includes those peoples that fear for themselves in being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, and membership of a particular social group or political opinion. A person in this situation is considered a refugee because they are unwilling or able to return to their home country. Learning about the challenges on the U.S. side of refugee relations as compared to refugee populations and service organizations in-country allowed us to preview a perspective on the challenges, successes, and gaps in the situation of refugees who navigate a complex system.

According to our classmates, 2,500 refugees are settled each year in Illinois. In the United States, 80,000 refugees are allowed to enter the United States a year. Many of these refugees are Palestinian or Iraqi. Some of these issues that face service managers in refugee organizations include lack of funding for the organizations who serve refugees, lack of funding for refugees entering the U.S., and lack of a unified, informative system to prepare and resettle refugees in the United States. Another issue involved the minuscule amount of background information received by the refugee service worker in the U.S.

Refugee service workers understand that there are numerous barriers presented to a refugee from any given area of the world, and they experience these challenges as well. A refugee becomes integrated at any time into 3 societies. They have their home country, a 2nd country (often temporarily), and then finally, they experience the shock of becoming permanently resettled in a 3rd country. Many of these refugees come from a variety of social, economic, and educational backgrounds, making the barriers to employment even more challenging. While many refugees from areas such as Iraq often have high educational backgrounds, they often cannot be placed into high paying careers due to their refugee status. Medical doctors from Iraq, for instance, must complete a long, expensive certification process to be accepted by the medical community in the U.S. Refugees experiencing culture shock find themselves going trough a range of emotions: elation, fear, anxiety, disappointment, and sometimes angry and grief.

In order to understand the challenges faced by refugees, it is first important to understand how the refugee navigates the system of receiving their status and how they end up to be in a 2nd or 3rd country. The United States High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was created on January 1, 1951 in order to help assist refugees who were displaced during World War II. With the realization of a burgeoning refugee population from countries in and outside of Europe, the agency set as its mission to aid refugees worldwide. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), another UN agency, was a mandate created in December 1949 to offer aid relief to Palestinian refugees who were displaced during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Both agencies continue to work for the protection and assistance of refugees in Jordan. They also face numerous funding challenges and availability of resources to aid refugees. These organizations assist the refugee through numerous interviews, security background checks, medical check-ups, and paperwork completion.

During our trip we had the opportunity to visit the UNHCR, UNWRA, and also the International Organization for Migration, or IOM. Our visits brought to light the obstacles the agencies have in dealing with economic and natural resource stresses and how it relates to the refugee situation. In Jordan, a country in the middle “of the Middle East” as Dr. Tavanti stated, is in a strategic yet difficult geographical location. They have accepted Palestinian refugees on an ideological and cultural stance to help their Arab brothers and sisters for nearly 60 years. They have also invited Iraqi refugees into the country as of 2003, but have not granted them refugee status, but instead refer to Iraqis as “guests”. This important reference is a symbol of the stresses that have put all refugees in a very delicate position in Jordan. The country has a population of nearly 6 million people, will have by 2001 nearly ½ million refugees of Iraqi and other descent. In addition, the UNHCR has registered almost 1 million Palestinian refugees. The fact that a large population of the country consists of refugees, Jordan has been searching for ways to support such a population even though there is a severe water and natural resource shortage, and that most of their income comes from international aid.

The system that a refugee faces when registering for resettlement is complicated, bureaucratic, and often overwhelming. Our experience visiting the IOM, an organization that works in partnership with UNHCR, was unique and eye opening. The organization believes that refugees should experience a humane migration, that their dignity and well-being should be a priority, and that social and economic development should be encouraged. This organization, like may others have been facing the challenges of staff shortage to deal with the increasing number of refugee interviews for Iraqi citizens, they receive irregular UNHCR referrals due to different fiscal years, and they receive unpredictable delays of the granting of Visas for refugees who sometimes wait for months or years for them. The difficulty in obtaining comprehensive information and preparatory trainings for the refugees seriously affects the service they receive at U.S. refugee organizations. As I noted before, monetary restraints and pressures to find a job within a short period make it difficult to settle refugees quickly. Often times, they are not fully prepared by the UN agencies or organizations because of a difficult process. The IOM tries to prepare refugees for the realities in the settling country, but it is often difficult to fully prepare individuals for resettlement.

Finally, it is these factors that one must take into account when understanding what it means to be a refugee and also what it means to be a service manager in the field. Advocacy and lobbying are an important part of what can change the system for refugees. These organizations and agencies rely heavily on international governmental funding. Uneven and unpredictable funding during certain time periods restrains organizations for the full preparation that goes into resettlement whether it is psychological, physical, economic or social. Workers in this field are often pushed to their limits of aid and face these aspects of culture shock and trauma. Further improvement of the system of evaluating refugee needs, securing steady funding for programs, improving intercultural and psychological preparedness trainings, and providing adequate training to refugee service managers can further improve the system. In the case of Jordan, and the Middle East, the United States and European Nations must address these challenges and find solutions as they are an integral part to refugee resettlement.

Naomi Czerwinskyj IPS Jordan Trip Summer 2010

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Experience at the UNHCR: On the Topic of the Jordanian Government

The staff at the UNHCR office provided us valuable information on the nature of the Iraqi refugee situation in Jordan and they explained the UNHCR’s role in protecting and initiating the resettlement process for the Iraqi population there. It was incredibly helpful to learn about the political dimensions of the situation. This information gave me a better sense of the situation and challenges that the government faces from an influx of refugees. The level of coordination that needs to take place in order to respond to this situation is incredible; the government has to be able to mobilize resources from governments, inter-governmental organizations (IGOs), and international and national organizations.

Although the government of Jordan did not sign the 1951 Refugee Convention, or have any policies regarding the protection refugees, they coordinate with organizations like the UNHCR to address the refugee situation in Jordan. The way that the government has responded to the Iraqi refugees is an example of how they observed “the right to refuge or protection [as] a genuine and non-derogable Arab practice” (Abou-El-Wafa 2009, 30). UNHCR staff explained that the integration of 500,000 refugees is not an option for the government, and so Iraqis are labeled as guests in their country to emphasize their temporary stay in Jordan. Consequently they do not have a legal status. This constituted a light bulb moment: this was the reason why the Palestinian refugees were distinguished from the Iraqi refugees in our previous discussions.

This meeting made me realize how crucial partnerships between the sectors really are. I can’t see how the government of Jordan could have responded to this situation alone. Considering a government is not likely to have budgets, infrastructure, processes or resources available to absorb an unexpected influx of refugees, the unpreparedness only aggravates the scale of issue and the need for collaboration to mobilize resources from wherever they may be available. A response time would depend on the lag between when the government would actually realize the influx of refugees, and able to quantify their numbers, to when they would able to act on a plan they put together (that is, if they are doing something other than putting them in detention centers). Needless to say it was an overwhelming experience.

The visit to the International Office of Migration (IOM) further clarified the processes that need to take place in order to resettle refugees, and where it picks up from where the government left off.

I had the opportunity to talk to Sireen, one of the UNHCR staff. We discussed the fact that Jordan had not signed the 1951 Refugee Convention and how the government was responding to the Iraqi refugee situation. She responded with conviction and passion when she said that the government wasn’t just deporting the refugees out of the country because these were individuals with real lives, families, and struggles. Sylvia mentioned how the U.S. deported many Cubans back to Cuba even though they were political refugees. It made me feel embarrassed. Sireen’s response was a good example of the Arab focus on the human dimension (Nydell 2006, 30). I was impressed by her assertive tone, which to me implied that deportation was not a humane option.